New Approach Needed to Address Inequities in Trans-Inclusive HIV/STI Prevention

New Approach Needed to Address Inequities in Trans-Inclusive HIV/STI Prevention

Transgender individuals continue to face significant barriers to accessing inclusive HIV/STI prevention and care, according to a recent study. The research highlights the impact of cissexism and structural racism on both the social and institutional levels, leading to adverse health outcomes and socioeconomic disparities in the transgender community.

The study, which examined 41 milestone HIV clinical trials over the past three decades, revealed a severe underrepresentation of transgender participants. Of the 171,062 study participants, less than 1% identified as transgender. This exclusion means that trans individuals lack equal access to evidence-based interventions and are unable to gather essential data to inform their clinical care, unlike cisgender individuals.

One of the study’s coauthors, Brian Minalga, emphasized the importance of inclusion and addressing the unique concerns of the transgender community. He stated that current research study designs fail to meaningfully include trans people and thus hinder healthcare providers’ ability to answer critical questions regarding the effects of HIV treatment and prevention drugs on gender-affirming hormone therapy.

Dr. Tordoff, another coauthor of the study, stressed the need for intersectional research approaches that disaggregate data by gender, race, and ethnicity. Understanding the diverse nature of transgender communities is crucial to develop more effective interventions and improve their overall health and well-being.

To achieve this, inclusion of historically excluded transgender individuals in research is essential. The definition of “MSM” (men who have sex with men) should be expanded to incorporate both cisgender and transgender men who have sex with cisgender and transgender individuals. This inclusive approach will ensure that the priorities and needs of the trans community are adequately represented in HIV research initiatives.

Furthermore, the study acknowledged the importance of community-based collaborations, such as the STARS advisory board, in addressing power imbalances in research. By actively involving transgender and non-binary communities in data interpretation, these collaborations raise awareness of the healthcare challenges faced by trans individuals.

In conclusion, the study’s findings highlight the urgent need to expand access to trans-inclusive models of HIV/STI prevention and PrEP delivery. By dismantling barriers rooted in cissexism and structural racism, healthcare systems can work towards addressing the inequities faced by the transgender community.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

1. Why are transgender individuals excluded from most HIV clinical trials?

Transgender individuals have historically been excluded from HIV clinical trials, leading to a lack of evidence-based interventions and limited data to inform their clinical care. This exclusion is a result of research study designs that fail to meaningfully include trans people.

2. How does this exclusion impact transgender individuals’ healthcare?

The exclusion of trans individuals from research studies means that healthcare providers often cannot answer critical questions about the effects of HIV treatment and prevention drugs on gender-affirming hormone therapy. This lack of information hinders appropriate and targeted care for the transgender community.

3. How can researchers better align HIV research with the needs of the trans community?

To better serve the trans community, researchers must adopt intersectional research approaches that disaggregate data by gender, race, and ethnicity. Additionally, expanding the definition of “MSM” to include both cisgender and transgender men who have sex with cisgender and transgender individuals is crucial.

4. What role do community advisory boards play in addressing healthcare disparities?

Community advisory boards, such as the STARS advisory board mentioned in the study, play an essential role in addressing power imbalances in research. They ensure that research findings are interpreted in a way that accurately reflects the concerns and priorities of the transgender and non-binary communities, raising awareness of the healthcare issues they face.

All Rights Reserved 2021.
| .