|
Issue dtd. May 2006
INSIDE
COVER STORY
RENDEZVOUS
IN CONVERSATION
MARKET
TREND
FOCUS
BOOKMARK
DIAGNOSTIC
TECHNOLOGY
IN NEWS
MANAGEMENT
PERSPECTIVE
HR
CALENDAR
VIEWS
PLANNING
INSURANCE
PEOPLE
PRODUCTS
SUPPLEMENTS
CRITICARE
LABWATCH
HOSPIUPDATE

ARCHIVES
SUBSCRIBE
CUSTOMER SERVICE
CONTACT US
ADVERTISE
ABOUT US


 Network Sites

  Express Computer

  IT People
  Network Magazine
  Business Traveller
  Express Hospitality
  Express TravelWorld
  Express Pharma
  Express Textile
 Group Sites
  ExpressIndia
  Indian Express
  Financial Express

Untitled Document
 

 

-
Home > In Conversation > Story

‘Simplicity, Cost-effectiveness & Ease Of Implementation Will Make NIAHO Popular’

Rebecca J Wise
Ashit Dalal

Spurred by emphasis on standards, quality and medical tourism, health accreditation is gaining popularity in Indian hospitals. And to cater to the surge in demand are a basket of accrediting bodies-JCI, JCAHO, NIAHO and ISO 9001 to choose from. US-based TUVHS is an accreditation firm engaged in accreditation of hospitals under NIAHO-ISO standards. Recently, its officials had come down to Mumbai to do a gap-analysis for Asian Heart Institute (AHI), which will soon apply for JCI. TUVHS's CEO Rebecca J Wise and Senior Project Manager Ashit Dalal told Rita Dutta about the demand for various accrediting bodies and why some are more popular

How different are JCI, JCAHO, NIAHO and ISO 9001 from each other? Please give a brief background of each of these accreditations.

Rebecca: JCI and JCAHO are very similar, as Joint Commission in the US has developed these standards. While JCAHO is typically applicable in the US, JCI is an international version of JCAHO (toned down version) and can be applied to any country.

NIAHO is again an international standard developed by TUVHS in the US and is based on ISO 9001:2000 framework, which is the generic standard for Quality Management System (QMS), developed by International Organisation for Standardization, Geneva. It is by far the most popular QMS standard in the world with about 7,00,000 certifications worldwide. NIAHO is the actual standard for healthcare developed by healthcare professionals with several decades of relevant experience. Since it has ISO 9001:2000 as its key framework, it integrates System and Process (Plan-Do-Check-Act) based approach of ISO with clinical and medical processes that one sees typically in any healthcare and hospital environment. In short, it brings together the best of both the worlds.

Which is the most popular accreditation system and why? Is popularity country-specific?

Rebecca: It is a tricky question and depends from what perspective you are looking. From the US perspective, JCAHO is the most popular as the Center for Medicaid and Medicare Services (CMS) makes it mandatory for US hospitals to get accredited by JCAHO (Joint Commission). JCI being an international arm of the Joint Commission is getting popularity outside the US and especially in India. However, outside the U, especially in Japan and EU, ISO 9001:2000 is still being commonly applied as Healthcare Quality Management System Standard. NIAHO is relatively new, but due to its simplicity, cost-effectiveness, ease of implementation and close interdependence with ISO 9001:2000, it is gaining popularity in the US. In the years to come, it will also become popular in India and other countries too.

Do you think that the Indian hospitals are ready for international accreditations, which are expensive? After all, only Apollo Hospitals, Delhi and Chennai Wockhardt Hospitals have acquired JCI and AHI is going through pre-assessment analysis for it.

Ashit: Yes, absolutely. India for whatever reason never had a formalised quality system framework, unlike the US, till recently. However, with the medical tourism growing at rapid pace, international accreditations like ISO-NIAHO and JCI have become the need of the hour. Expensive is a relative term again. When one sees the tremendous benefits and value-add that these accreditations bring onto the table, the cost of implementation and accreditation will be far outweighed by the benefits (such as enhanced patient satisfaction, lower infection control, improved patient safety, reduction in medication errors etc). In addition, tapping the medical tourism boom in itself will demand sine-quo-nun need for accreditation.

NIAHO is relatively new, awaiting US government's approval. Do you think that it is going to pick up fast? If yes, why?

Rebecca: Yes. CMS is close to approving NIAHO and is expected to accord final approval by the last week of June 2006. As such there are already about 25 hospitals accredited in the US in the last three to four months. Once CMS approval comes in June this year, the number of accreditations is expected to grow to more than 500 in next 12-18 months in the US alone. Even in India, there has been a lot of interest from large hospitals to acquire ISO-NIAHO certification.

With so many accreditation systems, how should a hospital shop for the best for them?

Ashit: Hospital has become an industry, which has very complex clinical and other support processes (like EHS, Facility Management, IT etc.) Patient safety and infection control are two key areas that one can improve with properly implemented Quality System Standard, be it JCI or ISO-NIAHO. Selection of the appropriate accreditation is contingent on the overall value and objectives, cost and internal requirements of the healthcare organisation.

Should a hospital go for a basket of accreditations, rather than only one? How will that help?

Ashit : It is dependent on what a hospital is overall looking for and what its business and internal requirements are. I feel starting with one set of accreditation (based on overall cost-benefit) system is the most cost-effective approach. For instance, a hospital can surely go for ISO-NIAHO based system to begin with. And once they get accredited, they can go for more expensive JCI type accreditation since with ISO-NIAHO in place, it is very easy and cost-effective to implement JCI, if required. In addition, hospitals that already have either ISO 9001: 2000 (like AHI) or JCI (like Wockhardt Hospital), it is very easy to implement NIAHO at marginal cost.

It is a known fact that most hospitals prepare themselves for getting accreditation, but once they achieve it, they are negligent towards maintaining the quality standards. How do we address such issues?

Ashit: It is the question of commitment of the hospital senior management and staff towards providing quality healthcare to their patients. That commitment and philosophy will drive the entire initiative and not just having a certificate on the wall. AHI is one such brilliant example of this kind of unparallel commitment, which we can see right from CEO to the lower most level. Being an Indian, I am very proud to say that hospital like AHI has one of the best patient safety and infection control standards in the world. This cannot just come from accreditation to ISO or JCI or NIAHO, but also requires an exemplary commitment of the senior management and the entire staff to achieve this kind of success.

A lot of people believe that ISO 9001 is the stepping stone to JCI. Please comment.

Ashit: As I have mentioned, ISO 9001:2000 is the generic standard that can be applied to any organisation including healthcare. Using that as the foundation, one can build any other system like JCI or NIAHO. However, I want to further add that it is easier to get accredited to NIAHO than JCI if the hospital already has ISO 9001:2000 accreditation. As a matter of fact, to get NIAHO accreditation, ISO 9001:2000 accreditation is mandatory, while there are no such requirements if you are just seeking JCI accreditation.

In India, JCI is picking up because of emphasis on medical tourism. Do you see other international accreditation systems also gaining equal popularity in India?

Ashit: Your observation is partly true. Till recently, JCI (based on JCAHO) has been the only known healthcare-specific standard internationally apart from generic ISO 9001:2000. However, with the advent of NIAHO, which is getting a lot of attention and popularity in the US, scenario shall change soon and you will see (especially those already accredited to ISO or are in the process of acquiring ISO) may soon start adopting NIAHO.

In the face of international accreditation systems coming to India, do you think that indigenous accreditation formed by QCI and CII-IHCF will stand a chance?

Ashit: QCI is the governing body for accrediting registrars that provide ISO accreditation services; JCI and NIAHO are healthcare industry-specific international standards from different organisations and are not governed by QCI accreditation.

A lot of auditors in healthcare accreditation don't have experience in healthcare. So, what is the ideal qualification for an auditor of accreditation in healthcare?

Rebecca: We are going to accept only those people as the auditors who are doctors or with MHA degrees and relevant healthcare background. Non-medical professionals without proper healthcare background will not be able to qualify to audit or certify hospitals. In addition, to become a NIAHO auditor, the healthcare professional must have completed recognised (IRCA or RABQSA) Lead Auditor Course in ISO 9001:2000 and also completed requisite training in NIAHO, which we shall start offering soon in India.

Please tell me about TUVHS and your plans for Indian operations.

Ashit: TUVHS is the part of Global TUV Group. TUV is a reputed accreditation body and registrar with excellent operations and large number of clientele in India. We shall work closely with their Indian operations in providing these services to Indian healthcare industry. However, overall programmes of ISO-NIAHO accreditation will be managed by TUVHS, US.

rita@expresshealthcaremgmt.com

Back to Top

© Copyright 2001: Indian Express Newspapers (Mumbai) Limited (Mumbai, India). All rights reserved throughout the world. This entire site is compiled in Mumbai by the Business Publications Division (BPD) of the Indian Express Newspapers (Mumbai) Limited. Site managed by BPD.