|
Right To Mental Health And The Barriers
Kamayani Bali Mahabal
Mental,
physical and social health are vital strands of life that are closely interwoven
and interdependent. Mental health is crucial to the overall well-being of individuals,
societies and countries. Mental health includes subjective well-being, perceived
self-efficacy, autonomy, competence, intergenerational dependence, and self-actualisation
of ones intellectual and emotional potential.
Health behaviour can affect physiology, while physiological functioning can
influence health behaviour, resulting in a comprehensive model of physical and
mental health, in which the various components are related and mutually influential
over time. The health behaviour of an individual is highly dependent on mental
health, individual psychological factors are also related to the development
of mental disorders. Social factors such as uncontrolled urbanisation, poverty
and rapid technological changes are also important. The relationship between
mental health and poverty is particularly important: the poor and the deprived
have a higher prevalence of disorders, including substance abuse.
|
Isolation, separation and discrimination of patients
lead to worsening of health from a mental health perspective. This is
the first principle which was truly applied in the reform in Italy. Italy,
the Nordic countries, Australia and Brazil were among the leading reformers
in the area of mental health
|
The World Health Organisation (WHO) reports that 450 million
people worldwide are affected by mental, neurological or behavioural problems
at any time. They are also universal, affecting people of all countries and
societies, individuals at all ages, women and men, the rich and the poor, from
urban and rural environments. They have an economic impact on societies and
on the quality of life of individuals and families. Around 20 per cent of all
patients seen by primary healthcare professionals have one or more mental disorders.
One in every four families is likely to have at least one member with a mental
disorder. Furthermore, according to the WHO, most middle and low-income countries
devote less than 1 per cent of their health expenditure to mental health.
In India, we do not have a separate mental health budget, but details are available
for the state of Gujarat. The States total allocation towards mental health
works out to Rs 82 million out of a total health budget of Rs 8,562 million.
Of this Rs 82 million, Rs 37 million is spent on mental hospitals, Rs 34 million
on medical colleges (presumably departments of psychiatry in medical colleges)
and Rs five million on district hospitals (Mission Report, 2003). It appears
that Rs 2.15 million under central sponsored schemes is the only
outlay on a community programme. About 67 per cent of the total expenditure
is on salaries and 20 per cent on medicines and supplies.
The paradox is that although treatment is available and are relatively cheap,
the problem continues to mount. A combination of relatively cheap medicines
and family support can effectively handle the problem. The gap between the treated
and untreated, between those reached and those not reached, is enormous.
This gap exists because there are barriers to implementation of the available
knowledge. The first barrier is the stigma and the discrimination attached to
those suffering from mental disorders. This prevents those affected from being
properly treated because the family hides the patient from the health services.
People believe that this happens only in developing countries. It is not so.
Insurance schemes are not recognising the parity between physical and mental
illnesses and they reimburse expenses on physical ailments but not mental ailments.
This practice is prevalent in many countries.
The second barrier is the wrong public health choice in the matter of allocating
money for mental health. In many countries, 80-90 per cent of the financial
resources go for maintaining large, inhuman and outdated mental health institutions.
There was a episode in Ervadi of an institution where basic human rights were
violated by chaining mentally ill patients.
Money is being allocated to such institutions even when we know that the most
effective interventions are community-based ones. Sometimes, this also explains
why people do not seek treatment. If the only option is a psychiatric hospital,
one that is poorly maintained, people will have no option but turn to quacks.
The third barrier is that we do not have enough specialists to deal with the
problems of mental illness. There is also a need to mainstream the skills and
knowledge of mental disorders, particularly in recognising and treating them.
This means training primary health care doctors, nurses and social workers-people
who are working in the community. We must use the few psychiatrists as multipliers
so that mental illnesses are treated effectively in the communities.
To address the barriers, we need more awareness among politicians and policymakers
that investing in mental health is better than non-treatment. Non-treatment
is much costlier than treatment because the consequences of non-treatment are
huge.
The public perception is that a mentally ill patient is a dangerous person and
is best locked up. Ironically, doctors themselves strengthen this perception.
They are delighted to remain in their offices instead of visiting communities
where the disease is prevalent. They find the option of staying back in their
hospitals more prestigious.
As a result, we tend to invest too much in hospitalisation, neglecting long-term
care at the community level. Human rights and the full enjoyment of citizenship
are the preconditions for any talk on mental disabilities.
Being a citizen is the best treatment for mental health problems. Isolation,
separation and discrimination of patients lead to worsening of health from a
mental health perspective. This is the first principle which was truly applied
in the reform in Italy. Italy, the Nordic countries, Australia and Brazil were
among the leading reformers in the area of mental health.
We need to combine civil passion, which recognises the rights of the patients,
with the intellectual passion for science. Civil passion without science will
be a disaster; and science without social commitment is a disaster as well.
These two ingredients need to balanced to make a difference to mental health
and well-being.
The writer is Senior Research Officer, CEHAT. Email- kmahabal@hotmail.com
|