|
‘Radial Artery Approach should not be glamourised’
EHM News Bureau - Mumbai
The take home message of a workshop on Radial Artery Approach (RAA) in performing
coronary angioplasties conducted at Dr LH Hiranandani hospital recently was
that RAA should not be glamourised as a superior technique to the conventional
groin approach.
Said Dr Ganesh Kumar, chief interventional cardiologist, Hiranadani Hospital,
who led the workshop, "RAA in performing coronary angioplasty is among
one of the changing trends in the field of percutaneous coronary interventions.
It is relevant in India, barring a few intricacies, as it is quite convenient
to patients, the recovery period being much faster. RAA should be rightly used
in selected cases, keeping the patients interest as a top priority, and should
not be glamourised to patients and cardiologists." Other experts on the
panel were Prof (Dr) Funck Francois, a leading interventional cardiologist from
France and an expert in RAA.
The workshop was aimed at highlighting the advantages and difficulties of this
very interesting technique. Speaking on the intricacies of the radial artery
approach, Dr Kumar said, "The radial approach requires selected cases in
Indian scenario because of the ethnic diversity of the country. This is because
of the fact that the radial artery (wrist artery) is much smaller in size compared
to the conventional femoral artery (artery of the groin). The size of the artery
is based on the height, weight and built up of the person." Hence, not
all cases are suitable for the radial approach.
The smaller radial arteries can go into spasm, which makes it difficult for
the catheter to manoeuvre inside the artery. "Upgradation of the catheter
into a large size becomes necessary in certain complex cases during the radial
approach procedure, which is time consuming," he added.
One of the cases in the workshop required bifurcation stenting
(implantation of two stents in the main and side branch simultaneously) for
which an upgradation to a larger size catheter and lot of catheter manipulation
was required. "We took almost two hours to complete this case, which by
a femoral approach could have taken less that an hour. Hence one should still
think twice before attempting a complex coronary intervention by this approach,"
said Dr Kumar. For another patient from the workshop weighing only 46 kgs having
thin with aesthetic built, both Dr Funck and Ganesh Kumar mutually agreed that
a femoral approach would be more appropriate in view of the small sized radial
artery.
|