|
Singh’s
objective of making India a global destination is well
addressed
Dr
K C Ojha
Honble
Finance Minister seems to have drafted Budget 2003 with
three principal objectives in mind:
i] Enhance national health
ii] Promote India as a global health destination
iii] Enable better access to health facilities These
objectives have been fulfilled through empowering the
private sector. This sector has been encouraged to set
up more facilities by way of the following:
Infrastructure industry benefits to hospital industry
Under the proposed amendment in section 10(23G) of IT
Act, any income by way of i] dividends, ii] interest
or iii] long-term capital gains of an infrastructure
capital fund/ an infrastructure capital company/ a co-operative
bank from investments made by way of shares or long-term
finance in any infrastructure undertaking including
construction of hospital projects with at least 100
beds or more will not be included in computing its total
income.
As a result, hospital projects with 100 beds and more
will be eligible for term loan from financial institutions
or venture capital funds at substantial concession rate
of interest (may be between 8 to 10 per cent per annum).
However in the FM in his budget speech has stated that
the move is to encourage new hospitals or expansion
of existing facilities. Whether expansion projects will
benefit therefore needs to be clarified.
Investors in the shares of corporate hospitals under
section 10(23G) of IT Act, will be eligible for tax-free
long term capital gain and tax-free dividend and lenders
advancing loan for the hospital projects of 100 beds
or more, their income by way of interest will be exempted
for computing taxable income.
Omission in the proposal for hospitals
It is worth drawing attention of the honble FM
that under the section 80 IA of the IT Act, the profit
of infrastructure project is not liable for income tax
for ten consecutive years out of 15 years from the date
of commencement of infrastructure project/ services.
However this benefit of tax exemption is not extended
to the hospital infrastructural projects through the
recent proposals. Hence the leaders of healthcare industry
should make appropriate representation immediately for
seeking this tax exemption and incorporate the same
in the finance Act finally. It is felt that this amendment
has escaped from the attention of appropriate authorities.
Service Tax
An aspect of Budget 2003 neglected by analysts is the
impending constitutional amendment to empower central
and state governments to levy service tax. This levy
of tax on services as a specific and important source
of revenue is being proposed after due amendments. The
constitutional amendment, and the consequent legislation
would give the Central Government the power to levy
the tax and both the Central and the State Governments
sufficient powers to collect the proceeds.
After the above stated amendment, state governments
may levy the tax on hospital services, on the ground
that many private hospitals are charging additional
charges as surcharge/service charges in the range of
10 to 20 per cent. In future, this power in the hands
of state governments may come as a serious blow to the
healthcare industry with the rate of service tax being
raised from 5 to 8 per cent this year. Service tax at
8 per cent is being imposed on the following services
which will cover services provided to healthcare industry:
a] Technical testing and analysis [excluding health
and diagnostic testing]
b] Maintenance and repair services namely, Annual Maintenance
Contracts [AMC] and authorized maintenance and repair
services [plant, machinery, equipment etc.]
c] Commissioning and installation services [plant, machinery,
equipment etc.]
d] Franchise service [one healthcare organisation is
providing franchise to other healthcare organization]
Hospitals will have to pay sizeable amount by way of
tax on procuring above stated services. At present Service
Tax is levied on following on health related services:
(a) Beauty treatment including beauty parlour, (b) Health
& fitness service, (c) Health club & fitness
center, (d) Technical testing and analysis (does not
including any testing or analysis service provided in
relation to human beings or animals)
Donation to charitable hospitals from the Trusts
having similar objects
Budget 2003 also empowers assessing officers to allow
inter-trust donations where a trust or institution is
being dissolved. Under the existing provision contained
in the proviso to sub-section (3A) of section 11, where
due to circumstances beyond the control of a trust or
institution in receipt of the income, the accumulated
income could not be applied for the purpose for which
it was accumulated or set apart. Transfer of any such
accumulated income to other charitable trusts/ institutions
is not allowed as application of income towards charitable
purposes.
This provision has created genuine problems for those
trusts and institutions, which are wound-up. In order
to remove this hardship, it is proposed to amend the
proviso to sub-section (3A) of section 11 so as to empower
the Assessing Officer to allow donation to another trust
or institution as application of accumulated income
for charitable purposes in the year in which the trust
or institution claiming exemption is dissolved. The
proposed amendment will take effect from 1 April, 2003,
and will, accordingly, apply in relation to the assessment
year 2003-2004 and subsequent years. The charitable
hospitals are likely to benefited by this amendment
in the IT Act.
Other amendments
Tax will not be deducted at source for professional
services fees taken for personal purpose. (to medical
doctors). This has been clarified the doubt in respect
of deduction of Income Tax at source.
Note: For more details, the readers are advised to study
section 10[23G] of IT Act, for benefits to infrastructure
industry and section 80DD, 88DDB and 80U of IT Act,
for deduction of expenses for medical treatment in respect
of disability of dependent persons or for himself and
specified disease. Deduction of medical treatment expenses
from total gross income
a] In respect of maintenance including for medical treatment
expenses of a dependent being a person with disability
over 40% upto rupees fifty thousand and a person with
severe disability [disability over 80%] upto rupees
seventy five thousand deductable from total gross income
[for more information refer section 80DD of IT Act].
b] In respect of himself, a person suffering from permanent
disability including blindness or is subject to mental
retardation upto rupees fifty thousand for disability
over 40% and for disability over 80% upto rupees seventy
five thousand deductable from total gross income. [for
more information refer section 80U of IT Act]
c] In respect of actually incurred any expenditure by
an assessee [for himself] for medical treatment of such
disease or element as may be specified in the rules
made in this behalf by the board are deductable from
total gross income [for more information refer section
80DDB of IT Act].
The author is managing director, Hospital Consultancy
Bombay Pvt Ltd (Hospic), Mumbai-based hospital consultancy
firm.
|