|
Issue Dtd. 16th to 30th November 2002
INSIDE
FOCUS
HOSPINEWS
LEGALITIES
MANAGEMENT
ALMANAC
EDIT
OPED
RENDEZVOUS
TECHNONOLOGY
EVENTS
CONVERSATION
PERSPECTIVE
HEALTHCARE IN KERALA

ARCHIVES
SUBSCRIBE
CUSTOMER SERVICE
CONTACT US
ADVERTISE
ABOUT US


 Network Sites

  Express Computer

  IT People
  Network Magazine
  Business Traveller
  Exp. Hotelier & Caterer
  Exp. Travel & Tourism
  Exp. Backwaters
  Exp. Pharma Pulse
  Express Textile
 Group Sites
  ExpressIndia
  Indian Express
  Financial Express
-
Home > OPED > Full Story

Doctor and Law

Dr Gopinath Shenoy, medico legal consultant and specialist in the defense of doctors in the Consumer Forums / Commissions answers your queries relating to legal aspectsof medical practice

Can I refuse to see a patient who has not paid my fees?

Dr Pradeep Sawant, Jalagoan, Maharashtra

The Code of Medical Ethics as formulated by the Maharashtra Medical Council which is applicable to medical practitioners determines when medical practitioners can refuse to see a case. Article 41 states that a doctor can refuse to see a patient if:

(1) He finds another practitioner in attendance.

(2) His fees remain unpaid despite notice.

(3) When the patient persists in abuse of intoxicants or poisons.

(4) When other remedies than those prescribed by him are being used.

(5) When the treatment prescribed is being persistently not followed.

(6) When other practitioner is consulted without his knowledge.

(7) When he is convinced that illness is an imposture and he is being made a party to false pretense. However he need not give up a case because he cannot cure it so long as the patient desires his services.

(8) When he is himself suffering from an illness requiring rest in the house.

One of the reasons given herein above is unpaid fees. This means that if the fees of the medical practitioner are outstanding and not paid by the patient, the medical practitioner is justified in refusing to subsequently see this patient. This incidentally is true for ’cold’ cases but is not applicable in emergencies wherein it is the bounden duty of the medical practitioner to examine the patient and do whatever is needful irrespective of the fees being paid or not. The Code as prescribed by the Maharashtra Medical Council is as of date not amended.

The Code of Conduct for medical practitioners formulated by the Medical Council of India has been recently amended and such a provision is absent in the amended Code.

Can I demand compulsory AIDS testing of my would be husband before marriage.

Dr Preeti Shah, Nadiad, Gujarat

In my opinion such a compulsion cannot be made enforceable by any Appropriate Authority because such a Rule/Law if promulgated will directly infringe upon the ’Right to Privacy’ of any individual. Recently there are newspaper reports that such a testing has been voluntarily accepted by certain areas. It would not be improper for the families of the bride and the groom to subject their wards to such testing if they so desire. To refuse such a request is also the right of the individual but adverse inference can be very easily drawn if there is such a refusal. In my opinion it is healthy to subject the prospective bride/groom to undergo HIV, VDRL and HBSAg testing before the marriage is settled. In my opinion this is the modern horoscope of an individual.

For a tonsillectomy I charge more than what the near by ENT surgeon does. Can I be taken to the Consumer Court by a patient for this?

Dr B P Mulla, New Delhi

It is a well-settled law that pricing cannot be made the subject matter for adjudication in the Consumer Courts provided there is no statutory control over such pricing. The fees collected by the medical professionals are not controlled by any statute or by any rule/law. Therefore how much to charge is left for the doctor to decide. Under the circumstances you cannot be taken to the Consumer Court just because you happen to be charging more than the doctor practicing near by.

The scenario changes if there is a statutory control over the price of a commodity - like for example drugs. Drug prices are governed by a statute, which controls it therefore charging more than the scheduled price is actionable in the Consumer Courts.

I am not able to see my patients at the appointed time. Can this amount to deficiency in services on my part and can I be sued by the patients for this?

Dr A B Patnaik, Calcutta

The National Commission has decided this particular issue wherein it has confirmed that if any doctor does not adhere to the appointment schedule, it does not amount to deficiency in services. It can be possible that some patients may take more time than what is allotted to them. It can also be possible that the doctor is professionally engaged with some serious patient who forces all appointments at the clinic to be cancelled. Many a times it is also possible that there is a serious patient who requires to be seen out of turn. Under the circumstances a doctor commits no offence if he were to see such patients without appointment or out of turn thereby upsetting the appointment schedule.

Readers may e-mail their queries to drgnshenoy@yahoo.com. He may also be contacted at (022) 24927403.

Back to Top


Copyright 2000: Indian Express Group (Mumbai, India). All rights reserved throughout the world.
This entire site is compiled in Mumbai by The Business Publications Division of the Indian Express Group of
Newspapers. Please Email our Webmaster for any queries / broken links on this site