|
Techno-Med
A Special Feature on
Medical Equipment Technology
‘India
should not be a dumping ground for medical equipment
of other countries’
J
V Vaidya, Vice-Chairman, Confederation of Indian
Industry, Medical Equipment Division, and past Chairman
of Indian Electrical and Electronic Manufacturers’ Association
(IEEMA), is an authority in the medical equipment industry
and has been associated with it for the last 15 years.
An electrical engineer from VJTI and post-graduate in
Power Systems, IIT, Mumbai, Vaidya, as the Joint General
Manager and Head, Strategic Business Unit, has been
the steering force behind L&T’s Medical Equipment and
Systems. In an interview with Rita Dutta, he
discusses issues related to medical equipment market
Do
think there should be accreditation for medical equipment
in India?
Yes, accreditation and standardization are extremely
necessary to monitor the quality of the mushrooming
of small time equipment manufacturers in India. Today,
anybody can start manufacturing equipment, like any
other small business, without any permission or license.
By the same norm, the quality of equipment sold by the
MNCs needs to be filtered also. India should not become
a dumping ground for other countries. In the US and
China, one needs to have FDA and SDA approvals respectively,
to sell medical equipment. Similarly, no medical equipment
can be installed in the European Union countries, unless
it carries the CE mark.
What
is the scope of the growth of the medical equipment
market?
As of today, the 1000-crore diagnostic and imaging equipment
industry, to a large extent dominated by MNCs, like
GE, Philips Medical Systems, Siemens, etc. is growing
at a rapid pace of 20 percent annually. The 500-crore
therapeutic equipment market, supported by the indigenous
companies, is growing at a modest pace of 8 to 12 per
cent annually.
Can you trace the growth of the medical equipment
industry?
The growth in the high end equipment market has been
quite substantial, if one compares with the scenario
in early 80s when to buy imported equipment it was necessary
to have Actual Users Import Licence (AUIL), to be obtained
from the Ministry of Commerce. One had to rely on a
dealer for that license. The turning point was in mid
80s, when the late Prime Minister, Rajiv Gandhi, encouraged
liberalisation by abolishing AUIL, which meant that
imported equipment can now be purchased directly, without
applying for a licence. In comparison, the growth of
the indigenous industry has been quite slow.
Liberalisation
gave a fillip to MNCs. Did it not stunt the growth of
the indigenous
industry?
No. While the indigenous industry is in manufacturing
middle and low-end equipment, though not necessarily
low-tech, the MNCs focus on high-end equipment.
Are the domestic manufacturers losing out to the
MNCs? Is there a clash of clientele?
No, there is no clash. The MNCs target the corporate
hospitals and super-speciality hospitals, mainly institutes,
where price is less of a concern for buying equipment.
Only 0.5 per cent of the population, i.e, the high income
group, can afford the treatment offered by the corporate
and super-specialty hospitals. The indigenous industry
has customers mainly in nursing homes, clinics as well
as private and government hospitals.
Did
the opening up of health insurance have an impact on
the medical equipment industry?
It is too early to say, since health care insurance
products have just been launched by a few players in
Oct. 2002. The impact is not as much as it was expected.
Insurance players are more cautious about health care
industry, with the increase in the life-span of common
man. They want to take calculated risk. The impact would
only be felt when health insurance would be offered
at a reasonably attractive terms to customers.
What
factors can be attributed to the growth of indigenous
industry ?
The fact that the middle-class has become aware of various
diagnostic techniques as never before. The increase
of normal life span of a man is also another factor.
The upper age group spends more on his health for the
last five years of his life than he did before. The
strengthening of referral system and the spate of nursing
homes have also spurred the growth.
What
hurdle do the indigenous companies face in making high-end
equipment ?
Some Indian manufacturers often find it difficult to
bridge technology gap and need to catch up with the
MNCs in research and development. The MNCs have been
there for many years, whereas the Indian companies have
to find innovative ways to acquire technology and nurture
it at a rapidly accelerated pace.
Can
we expect the indigenous manufacturers to make high-end
equipment in the near future?
The possibility cannot be ruled out. May be within less
than a decade, the indigenous companies would start
manufacturing high- end equipment. By the time domestic
companies make it, however, the MNCs would have already
improved on their technology, thus maintaining a technology
gap, which could, in due course of time, be narrowed.
Do
the indigenous manufacturers need to cultivate an export
mind set for sustaining in this economy?
It is absolutely necessary to look outwards, adopting
a global approach i.e. an export mindset. Since India
represents almost two per cent of the world market in
medical equipment, if we make our equipment qualitywise
and costwise suitable for the export market, the industry
can grow by leaps and bounds.
Medical equipment is inherently low volume, highly intellectual
and manual effort requirement business. This is because
of stress on design, embedded software capabilities,
testing, simulation and clinical trials.
What is needed, however, is to get satisfied with nothing
less than the global benchmarking in quality and performance.
Once this is done, international quality certifications,
both for the manufacturing and service support systems,
would go a long way in building export business. The
most difficult part, however, may be to build marketing
capabilities outside India.
These are expensive and there is no clear roadmap available
or a simple magic formula applicable to all countries.
This is where innovativeness will score, which Indians
are good at. Given the required time and resources,
India would gear up for export opportunities in the
global market. This is evident from the fact that in
the forthcoming Medica 2002 exhibition in Dusseldorf,
Germany, more than 50 Indian companies are likely to
take up stalls and display their capabilities.
|